-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 302
document docker in kata #414
Comments
Fixes: kata-containers#414 Signed-off-by: Eric Ernst <[email protected]>
Fixes: kata-containers#414 Signed-off-by: Eric Ernst <[email protected]>
/cc @jcvenegas FYI - see egernst@4bfb22b |
I have some dibs on what we call this.... along the lines of 'dind' for Docker-In-Docker ... I reckon.... :-) |
Let's stop dinking around and see how kinky boots! 😄 |
@egernst @grahamwhaley have you consider use CONFIG_OVERLAY_FS=y by default in our kernel, or you think is not an strong usecase to enable it? |
@jcvenegas it's not been on my radar before - is that something we need to have for DinK to work? If so, we can for sure consider adding it. |
@grahamwhaley looking to @egernst commit seems that is the recommended fs to use and builds a kernel manually. Probably we can make the process less painful if we add it by default. |
related issue: kata-containers/runtime#1429 |
Docker-in-Kata doesn't seem to make sense for security, until Kata get support for |
We should document how to run docker from within a Kata container.
This addresses kata-containers/runtime#358
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: