Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on May 12, 2021. It is now read-only.

document docker in kata #414

Closed
egernst opened this issue Mar 26, 2019 · 8 comments
Closed

document docker in kata #414

egernst opened this issue Mar 26, 2019 · 8 comments
Labels
enhancement Improvement to an existing feature

Comments

@egernst
Copy link
Member

egernst commented Mar 26, 2019

We should document how to run docker from within a Kata container.

This addresses kata-containers/runtime#358

@egernst egernst added the enhancement Improvement to an existing feature label Mar 26, 2019
egernst pushed a commit to egernst/documentation that referenced this issue Mar 26, 2019
egernst pushed a commit to egernst/documentation that referenced this issue Mar 26, 2019
@egernst
Copy link
Member Author

egernst commented Mar 27, 2019

/cc @jcvenegas FYI - see egernst@4bfb22b

@grahamwhaley
Copy link
Contributor

I have some dibs on what we call this.... along the lines of 'dind' for Docker-In-Docker ... I reckon....
Docker-In-Kata is 'dink'
Kata-In-Kata is 'kink'

:-)

@jodh-intel
Copy link
Contributor

Let's stop dinking around and see how kinky boots! 😄

@jcvenegas
Copy link
Member

@egernst @grahamwhaley have you consider use CONFIG_OVERLAY_FS=y by default in our kernel, or you think is not an strong usecase to enable it?

@grahamwhaley
Copy link
Contributor

@jcvenegas it's not been on my radar before - is that something we need to have for DinK to work? If so, we can for sure consider adding it.

@jcvenegas
Copy link
Member

@grahamwhaley looking to @egernst commit seems that is the recommended fs to use and builds a kernel manually. Probably we can make the process less painful if we add it by default.

@egernst
Copy link
Member Author

egernst commented Mar 27, 2019

related issue: kata-containers/runtime#1429

@AkihiroSuda
Copy link

Docker-in-Kata doesn't seem to make sense for security, until Kata get support for --privileged without exposing host devices kata-containers/runtime#1568

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
enhancement Improvement to an existing feature
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants