You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on May 12, 2021. It is now read-only.
Thanks @jodh-intel for fixing arm build😊, and it may need some refinement for CPUInfo.
Variable vendor and model in struct CPUInfo may refer to different meaning in Arm architecture. The CPU Model for Arm should mean the Instruction set, that is the variant number of Arm processor and the CPU Vendor for Arm should be the CPU core IP Implementer.
Expected result
some example from kata-runtime kata-env:
[Host.CPU]
Vendor = "ARM Limited"
Model = "v8"
Actual result
[Host.CPU]
Vendor = "0x41"
Model = "0x1"
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The CPUinfo need to be refined in Arm architecture, because the
vendor and model of CPU may refer to different meaning in Arm architecture.
Besides, relevant contents extracted from /proc/cpuinfo may need to be
normalized for human-readability.
Fixes: kata-containers#368
Signed-off-by: Penny Zheng <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Wei Chen <[email protected]>
Description of problem
Thanks @jodh-intel for fixing arm build😊, and it may need some refinement for CPUInfo.
Variable vendor and model in struct
CPUInfo
may refer to different meaning in Arm architecture. The CPU Model for Arm should mean the Instruction set, that is the variant number of Arm processor and the CPU Vendor for Arm should be the CPU core IP Implementer.Expected result
some example from
kata-runtime kata-env
:Actual result
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: