Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add crictl config e2e tests #1659

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 25, 2024

Conversation

saschagrunert
Copy link
Member

What type of PR is this?

/kind cleanup

What this PR does / why we need it:

Adding e2e tests for the config get / set.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Follow-up on #1643

Special notes for your reviewer:

None

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

None

Signed-off-by: Sascha Grunert <[email protected]>
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Oct 25, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Oct 25, 2024
@kwilczynski
Copy link
Member

/approve
/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 25, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: kwilczynski, saschagrunert

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 5b47b2e into kubernetes-sigs:master Oct 25, 2024
34 checks passed
@saschagrunert saschagrunert deleted the config-e2e branch October 25, 2024 08:36
Expect(cfg).To(MatchRegexp("timeout .* 10"))
})

It("should succeed to set config values and preserve comments", func() {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I wonder how it will treat duplicate entries.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It will only change the first one, which is a bug. Going to fix that in #1661

Expect(cfg).To(MatchRegexp("timeout .* 10"))
})

It("should succeed to set config values and preserve comments", func() {
Copy link
Member

@SergeyKanzhelev SergeyKanzhelev Oct 25, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't know if preserving comments is a valuable feature. But I can see how it may be useful and some people relying on it, thank you for adding a test!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants