Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Discover cookbook gsoc2025 #492

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

aterrel
Copy link
Member

@aterrel aterrel commented Feb 22, 2025

This pull request adds DISCOVER Cookbook as a potential project.

DISCOVER Cookbook is a project of the NumFOCUS DISC committee so not a affiliated or sponsored project, but we believe it should still be eligible for participation. Additionally we realize GSOC is primarily concerned with code contributions, we are proposing coding work on the actual implementation of the cookbook rather than content. We see precedence for NumFOCUS committee projects and code to deliver content in former GSOC projects and feel it should be accepted.

@kamila-NF and I will be the sub-org administrators.

Thank you for your consideration!

@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ page of each organization under the NumFOCUS umbrella at this page.
- [ArviZ](https://github.com/arviz-devs/arviz/wiki/GsoC-2025-projects)
- [conda / rattler](https://github.com/conda/rattler/issues/1058)
- [Data Retriever](https://github.com/weecology/retriever/wiki/GSoC-2025-Project-Ideas)
- [DISCOVER Cookbook](https://github.com/numfocus/DISCOVER-Cookbook/discussions/208)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Google expects some level of organization for the project. Please take a look at the ideas submitted by your peers to refine your proposal accordingly. Thank you!

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Okay I added the recommended structure. Let me know if there is anything further you would like to see before merging! Thanks.

@aterrel aterrel requested a review from henrykironde March 3, 2025 11:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants